Continuous patient engagement in cardiovascular disease clinical comparative effectiveness research.


Researchers have produced evidence that identifies interventions that reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, despite a significant investment in research CVD remains the leading cause of death. Engaging patients in the research process has the potential to ensure that evidence-based treatments are adopted in real-world practice to improve patient outcomes. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has created an Engagement Rubric to guide meaningful engagement in the research process. A 10-step systematic framework to enhance patient engagement throughout the comparative effectiveness research process also has been proposed. This special report identifies the relationship between these two approaches to patient engagement and describes examples of how patients could be engaged in a hypothetical CVD study.

AuthorsJ Vandigo; E Oloyede; A Aly; A L Laird; CE Cooke; CD Mullins
JournalExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Therapeutic AreaHematology
Service AreaPatient-Centered Outcomes
LinkClick Here